Involving teams in the nomination process for Blue Jacket of the Year can lead to which of the following?

Involving teams in the nomination process for Blue Jacket of the Year fosters a more comprehensive view of the nominee's impact because it allows for a collective evaluation of the individual's contributions. When team members participate in the nomination, they can share diverse perspectives and insights on how the nominee has influenced their work and the team’s success. This collaborative approach captures a fuller picture of the nominee's skills, experiences, and overall impact within the organization or community, which may not be visible from a single individual's viewpoint.

Furthermore, this inclusivity can highlight achievements that may have been overlooked if only one person were to assess the nominee. Rather than focusing solely on personal accolades, team input conveys how the nominee supports and uplifts the team dynamics and morale, thereby enriching the nomination with well-rounded supporting testimonials. This ultimately helps ensure that the recognition is awarded to someone whose influence resonates deeply across the team, leading to a meaningful selection process.